Disbanded by the Archbishop’s Orders: The Intercessors of the Lamb

by Therese Ivers, JCL

One of the purposes of this website is to give tools to those discerning their vocation to help enable them to make an informed decision.  I have not been posting on this site too often lately because I have been focusing on writing a book for those thinking about the religious life.  This book is about the nuts and bolts of evaluating a prospective convent/abbey/monastery as a possible “fit” for oneself.  While I have drafted what I think is a catchy title for this book, I think about it in terms of “the good, the bad, and the ugly of religious life”.  Why?  Because in looking at a community, one must often use a similar technique that one would use in being prudent about a potential spouse.  By knowing the good, the bad, and the ugly about many marriages, one can learn to evaluate the possible compatibility of another human being as a prospective spouse.  Now, my book has (at the moment) nothing to do directly with the Intercessors of the Lamb.  However, part of what I am trying to do is alert people to important aspects of community life which may be disruptive or injurious to one’s own well-being because certain “red flags” were ignored, and I think that while these things will be covered in great detail in my upcoming guide, some of the problems which were highlighted before the suppression of the Intercessors of the Lamb can furnish some food for thought for those discerning religious life in the meantime.

The lay association called the Intercessors of the Lamb (IOL) had contacted the Archdiocese of Omaha to see if they could take the next step in reaching a more serious level of canonical standing within the Church.  As a Public Association of the Faithful, the Intercessors of the Lamb in the Church were like a civil corporation within the US- they were a group with a common identity, written statutes, a board, etc.  They wanted to go beyond simple  “incorporation” in the Church and become a recognized institute or society that lived a consecrated lifestyle in the Church.  However, the canon lawyer who was hired by the Archbishop to evaluate the community’s readiness to take the next step found that there were serious problems within the community.  Shortly after an attempt was made to begin addressing these problems by putting in place a new “superior”, the group was officially disbanded because the lay board of the community refused to cooperate with the Archbishop of Omaha.  Of course, hindsight is often 20/20, but I would like to point out some of the things an informed discerner could have looked out for if he or she had been seriously considering joining the Intercessors of the Lamb.

Reasons Why Knowing the Canonical Status of a Community is Important

1.  Only members of Diocesan-right or Pontifical-Right Religious Institutes are religious and enjoy the rights of religious and the obligations of religious.  Vowed members of such Religious Institutes are in the consecrated state.  The Intercessors of the Lamb, contrary to popular opinion, were NEVER a religious institute and its members were not in the consecrated state.  “Consecrated” or vowed Members had some of the trappings of religious life:  a habit, vows, chapel, statutes, etc., but they were not recognized in the Church as true religious.  Why?  Because they were in the more risky (to discerners) stage of being a Public Association of the Faithful.  While they had the intention and hope of eventually following some kind of consecrated lifestyle in a form approved by the Church, the Intercessors of the Lamb had the same status as any other Public Association of the Faithful (think Legion of Mary, Worldwide Marriage Encounter, etc.).  A good percentage of Public Associations of the Faithful who wish to become a Religious Institute or evolve into a Secular Institute or a Society of Apostolic Life simply fold, fizzle out, are suppressed, or disintegrate for a variety of reasons.  Oftentimes, it is because there are unhealthy practices within the community, shady financial practices, personality struggles, etc.  The bottom line is that even people with vows in a Public Association of the Faithful remain lay (if non-ordained) because they are not in a Religious Institute.

2.  A good percentage of Public Associations of the Faithful who desire to evolve into a recognized form of consecrated life fold.  This can have a detrimental effect to your livelihood and future if you were to join one and it was disbanded or the leaders ran off with the money or the superior kicks you out because you have a personality clash.  Please understand that the Archdiocese of Omaha is being extraordinarily helpful to the former members of the now suppressed IOL.  Since the members were NOT religious, the Archdiocese was not obligated in law to provide for the material needs of the ex-members any more than a diocese would be obligated to support (for a time) an ex-member of the Legion of Mary or Knights of Columbus.  (As a side note, I find it quite interesting and perhaps not entirely coincidental that it was the “lay” branch that controlled the finances (all of the group was lay, but the “lay” branch indicated by the news probably refers to the associated members who did not take the private vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience) that was the portion of the IOL that refused to cooperate with the Archbishop.  It was those members who had donated their money before entering with their private vows who suffered from their private vow of poverty as a result.)  The moral of the story for discerners who are thinking about joining a community that wants to be a religious institute  or live a consecrated lifestyle eventually is that the aid given to the ex-members of the IOL by the Archdiocese is extraordinary.  Finances are usually tight for start-up groups, and if you leave or it disintegrates or is suppressed, you can usually count on being practically on the street with little or no money to restart your life.  Let me say this again.  Even with established religious Orders, ex-members have been known to have been given a plane ticket and $250-$500 to begin anew.  I suppose that’d buy you a tent and a suit for job interviews but little else.  Have no family?  That’s just your tough luck.  Perhaps a homeless shelter will take care of you until you get on your feet.

Coming Next:  Why Canonist Pete Vere’s signs could have been helpful for the person who was discerning the IOL. As I am planning a series on the Intercessors, if you have any questions or comments about Public Associations of the Faithful or the suppressed Intercessors of the Lamb, please feel free to comment on these posts or use the contact us form.

(C) 2010 by Therese Ivers, JCL

www.DoIHaveAVocation.com

Posted in Canonical Requirements, Consecrated Life, Discernment, private vow, Religious, vocations, Vows | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Consecrated Virgins Part II

Table of contents for Consecrated Virgins

  1. Consecrated Virgins Part I
  2. Consecrated Virgins Part II
  3. Consecration Vs. Vow

by Therese Ivers, JCL

This is a belated continuation of a series of posts on consecrated virgins living in the world.

Q.  I read this explanation of consecrated virgins on a vocations website and wanted to know if this is accurate:

From the beginnings of the Church there have been those who felt the call to consecrate themselves exclusively to Christ in a private manner. In recent times there has been a revival of this vocation, by which a woman makes her private consecration in the presence of her bishop.

A.  This description of consecrated virginity is highly inaccurate and unfortunately widespread on the internet.  I will respond to each sentence of this explanation of the vocation separately.

From the beginnings of the Church there have been those who felt the call to consecrate themselves exclusively to Christ in a private manner.

From the beginning of the Church, women have felt the call to follow Christ exclusively and completely.  They were known in the early Church as “virgins” and this was a public vocation, not a way of life lived “in a private manner”.  It is said that the Apostle Mathew was the first known Bishop to have conferred the consecration of virgins (upon the princess Iphigenia for which he was martyred as her kingly father wanted to marry her off and couldn’t because of the consecration).  However, this was far from being a private affair; members of the Order of Virgins had special privileges in the ancient Church because of their public status as brides of Christ.  What were some of these privileges?  Virgins occupied a special place of honor in the assembly in Church.  They often assisted the deaconesses in the ministry of baptism.  As membership in the Order of Virgins was public, many of the Church fathers wrote about consecrated virgins and how they were to live.  St. Cyprian described consecrated virgins as “the choicest portion of the Lord’s flock”.  That this vocation was not private is implicit in the Catechism of the Catholic Church which states:  From apostolic times Christian virgins, called by the Lord to cling only to him with greater freedom of heart, body, and spirit, have decided with the Church’s approval to live in a state of virginity “for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven.”  [CCC 922, emphasis added]

In recent times there has been a revival of this vocation, by which a woman makes her private consecration in the presence of her bishop.

Since the revision of the Rite of Consecration of Virginity promulgated in 1970, female virgins living in the world were once more permitted to receive the consecration of virgins from their bishop after a short temporary exclusion dating from the 1950′s.  This is not private and it is not made by the woman.  This is a public ceremony in which the bishop confers the consecration upon the female virgin, constituting her a “sacred person” and placing her in the (public) consecrated state.  No vows are made, either public or private in this Rite.  Instead, the virgin is consecrated body and soul as a bride of Christ through the ministry of the bishop.  This is similar to what happens at an Ordination.  A man or deacon does not make promises which somehow transform him into a deacon or priest.  Instead, the sacrament of Orders is conferred upon him by the bishop and it is this conferral of Orders which constitutes him a deacon, priest, or bishop.  Priests and deacons do make promises during their ceremony, but consecrated virgins don’t.  Once a man legitimately receives Holy Orders, he belongs to the ordained state of life, in the hierarchy.  Once a female virgin legitimately receives the consecration of virgins from her bishop (or a bishop delegated by him), she belongs to the consecrated state of life and no longer in the lay state.

Q.  I am thinking about becoming a consecrated virgin.  This seems to be a personal matter between me and Christ and so I don’t want this to be public.  Can’t I just have a private consecration?

A.  If John wishes to marry Gloria, their marriage is between themselves but their vows create a new reality for them and for the Church.  They become husband and wife and join the married state when they get married.  Even if John and Gloria get married in the rectory or just in front of a priest/deacon and two witnesses, the marriage is a public act and their new status is public of being married with a true spousal bond between them.  They don’t need a whole church full of people to make their marriage a public ceremony celebrating a new public status that they enjoy once they exchange vows.  A consecrated virgin becomes a sacred person and a bride of Christ when the sacramental consecration of virgins is conferred upon her by the Bishop.  This can be done in a small chapel or (preferably in the mind of the Church)her Cathedral in front of hundreds or thousands of people.  Either way, the consecrated virgin has become a member of the consecrated state and is no longer single nor lay.  In this sense, her commitment (even if only the bishop was present doing the consecration) is very public.

Q.  I believe that there are four vocations- the priesthood, marriage, religious life, and the single life.  Do consecrated virgins belong to the generous single life?

A.  There are three states in the Church:  lay, ordained, and consecrated.  Most people are called to be in one of the vocations in these states in Holy Orders (permanent/transitional diaconate, priesthood, and episcopacy),  Consecrated Life (religious life, diocesan eremitic life, and consecrated virginity), or to Matrimony (in the lay state).   Some people are in more than one vocation such as the married deacon (married state+ ordained state) or the religious priest (consecrated state + ordained state).  Those in the consecrated state cannot be in the lay state.  Consecrated virgins, therefore, are not singles nor are they lay.  They are brides of Christ (a relationship) and they are in the consecrated state.

Q.  I thought that consecrated virgins are lay women because they are not priests.  Why do you say they are not lay?

A.  There are two ways the word “lay” is used in the Church.  The first way is to refer to non-ordained persons in the hierarchical sense.  Thus, in this view, the Church is divided into two hierarchical categories, ordained and non ordained (lay).  In this sense, even non-ordained religious and hermits are “lay” because they are not ordained.   In the other view, which is not hierarchical but vocational, the Church is seen to be divided into three categories: ordained, consecrated, and lay.  On this subject, the Catechism says:  “the state of life which is constituted by the profession of the evangelical counsels, while not entering into the hierarchical structure of the Church, belongs undeniably to her life and holiness.” CCC 914  This is how canon law talks about consecrated life as not being lay or ordained:  “In itself, the state of consecrated life is neither clerical nor lay.” – CIC 588  Thus, consecrated virgins are not lay when it comes to the states of life, any more than a religious monk or sister is lay.

Q.  Can a consecrated virgin adopt a child?

A. Consecrated virgins live out their consecrated life in accordance with the bishop’s directives.  The joys of motherhood are not proper to the virgin who remains celibate for the sake of the Kingdom.  To understand this better, a married person agrees not only to be open to children (and the sexual dimension requisite for the procreation of children) but also to assume the duties of educating and rearing of any children God may bless the couple with.  The responsibility of educating and parenting of a child in preparation for that child’s eventual maturity as an adult is intrinsically bound with the parental generation of the child. Therefore, unless the child in question is a close relative without other resources, it is not proper for a consecrated virgin to adopt a child as the renunciation of parenting is an implied part of the virgin’s renunciation of sexual intercourse (and its consequences).  A decision so momentous which doesn’t normally foster the virgin’s freedom to think upon the things of the Lord without worries stemming from a physical spouse and children must be approved by the virgin’s bishop for her to be able in good conscience to adopt a child without betraying her vocation.

Another objection to a consecrated virgin’s adoption of a child has to do with the way God designed humans to be formed.  The acts proper for the procreation of children and the education of any resultant children is an essential element of marriage.   A child’s best interest is served by the stable, permanent union of a male parent and female parent with their masculine and feminine influences and complementary gifts with which to give the child the environment necessary for a holistic upbringing. This may be one reason why Mary and Joseph were married- to give the Child Jesus a stable family unit with male and female modeling.

Posted in Consecrated Life, Consecrated Virgins | Tagged , | 6 Comments

World Day of Prayer for Vocations Sunday

I am curious to know how many people will actually hear about praying for vocations at Sunday Mass, and whether this will be confined to the usual prayer for “priests and religious”. If your priest/deacon is on the ball and can name other vocations besides that to the priesthood and religious life, this would be a time to celebrate, and then pray hard for increased vocations entered by public vows, holy orders, or consecration. Please take a moment and share with the rest of us via the poll on the left side what you hear on Sunday regarding vocations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Can an Illegitimate Man Become a Priest?

by Therese Ivers, JCL

Now and then a man discerning the priesthood will wonder if the old rules about legitimacy apply if he’s considering the priesthood. Sometimes even diocesan websites state that the Catholic marriage certificate of the candidate’s parents must be submitted with the application. The reality is that prior to 1983, illegitimacy was an impediment to the priesthood and receiving Holy Orders. With the promulgation of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, this is no longer the case. Since illegitimacy does not pose an impediment to Holy Orders, a man is not required by universal law to submit his parent’s marriage certificate to a diocese, and he might do well to point this out to the diocesan vocations director in a charitable fashion. Further, if a person’s application is rejected solely on account of his being born illegitimately, he should speak to a canon lawyer.

(c) 2010 by Therese Ivers, JCL
www.DoIHaveAVocation.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Can You Beat The Score?

I recently created a quiz for my diocese’s vocations website…  and the highest score thus far has been 64% correct. Can you beat this score? The first 10 people to get above 90% correct (put in your full name in the quiz) and post a comment in the forum section of this website will receive a very special prize in the mail. Winners will be contacted and asked for their mailing address via the forum. Here’s the link to the 13 question quiz. Oh, by the way, some questions have more than one correct answer- you need to click on all the ones that are right.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments