Private Vows Of Poverty, Chastity, And Obedience

February 29th, 2008 · 2 Comments

by Therese Ivers

 For centuries people have been embracing the evangelical counsels and binding themselves to observe them by the vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience.  The most common example we have of persons making these vows are the men and women who make their profession of vows as religious.  These religious make what is known as public vows.   Not all people, however, are called to make public vows, but instead elect to follow the evangelical counsels through private vows.

There is one primary difference between a public vow of poverty, chastity, or obedience and a private vow of poverty, chastity, or obedience.  Public vows are made in a religious profession, profession of a member of a secular institute, or in the hands of the bishop of a diocesan hermit and have the effect of placing the individual in the consecrated state in the Church.  Private vows are made outside of this context of Ecclesiastical acceptance and they do not change the status of the individual making them within the Church.

Concretely, this means that if Mark would like to dedicate his life to Christ but does not feel called to enter religious life, join a secular institute,  become a diocesan hermit, or receive Holy Orders, he may consider whether he is called to make private vows.  Making private vows, especially those of the evangelical counsels, is not something to undertake lightly and ought to be done only after careful consideration, prayer, and consultation with a spiritual director.

One final thought.  Vows can remain private even when made in a Church ceremony.  An example of this can be when a priest receives private vows of an individual during Mass.   The mere fact that a vow is made in front of other people does not make it public in the eyes of the Church.  Members of any group that is not recognized in the Church as a religious or secular institute who make vows in a ceremony or Mass in their community are not to consider themselves in the consecrated state because their vows are essentially private.  Hence to call themselves consecrated men or women is misleading as they are not officially recognized in the Church as belonging to the consecrated state.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Tags: Consecrated Life · Hermits · Religious · Secular Institutes · Vows · private vow · vocations

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 bonnie // Apr 6, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    Very good and important information, though I would like to raise my voice for the many women who have taken private vows and live them out, being a Catholic yes…but not with the Churches official permission per say. Here is a reality check for the many women who would like to do this….pray and do it. This world is changing very fast and to find a spiritual director in your parish, or someone who might even be remoutly interested in speaking to you..is close to miraculous. These are just facts, for I love my Catholic faith. But to find “religious” priests or nuns…who have the time and who are interested is very difficult, well at least here in the state of ohio!.

  • 2 karen // Apr 12, 2008 at 5:22 pm

    Good observation though it raises a question for me. I was always told that God prefers obedience over sacrifices made without obedience. So if you want to make your vows publicly with the blessing of the Church, how do you go about doing it?

    It’s true that it’s hard to find good spiritual directors (I’ve had the same one for 20 years now thanks to the ability to correspond via email) so what do you do when none are to be readily found?

    Nice website, by the way. Thanks for the info!

You must log in to post a comment.