February 2: World Day for Consecrated Life

by Therese Ivers, JCL, OCV

His Holiness the Pope rarely presides over public liturgies.  The importance of World Day for Consecrated Life is such that he prays Vespers and gives an official address on each Feast of the Presentation to consecrated persons.  Since the Marian (consecrated life) dimension of the Church is as essential as the Petrine (ordained life) in the life of the Church according to our Holy Father, dioceses should take their cue from Rome and also host celebrations for Consecrated Life in their cathedrals.  It is the one day that the Church prays for the consecrated, that is, for those of us who normally pray for the rest of the Church!

The Vicariate of Rome issued the invitation to the Papal Vespers and Address to religious superiors, religious, consecrated virgins, members of secular institutes, members of apostolic societies, hermits, and others in consecrated life living in Rome.  For those who don’t know, the Vicariate of Rome functions as the “diocese” of Rome and govern in the name of the Pope.  There is a bishop assigned for consecrated persons.   I found it ironic that in the official invitation, the Vicariate mentioned that the contemplative (cloistered) religious would be spiritually present, and yet hermits were invited.  Perhaps it was an official oversight in terms of the incongruity.  Or, perhaps the Vicariate wanted to make it clear that this is one occasion in which it is very appropriate for the hermit to leave his/her hermitage and join the other consecrated persons in celebrating this day in the cathedral.  It is heartening, however, that the Vicariate did not limit its invitation to religious.  Now I just wait with bated breath – not really – for a consecrated virgin to be one of those selected to have some part in the ceremony as I noticed that only habited religious were chosen this year.  At any rate, it is my fervent hope that dioceses will follow the example of the Vicariate of Rome and remember to include consecrated virgins and hermits in their mailings.

 

 

 

On a personal note, yours truly was able to participate in this Liturgy with another consecrated virgin, Jenna Cooper, the author of a blog on consecrated virginity.  We disagree on many practical interpretations of how our vocation is to be lived out but we are united in the love of our Divine Spouse and total self gift to the Lord.  Speaking of consecrated virgins, on my way home from the papal liturgy, I passed the place where the International Congress for Consecrated Virgins was held in 2008.  It brought back so many memories of the 500+ virgins who attended from over 52 countries.

Posted in Consecrated Life, Consecrated Virgins, Hermits, St. Peter's, Vatican, vocations | Leave a comment

Should Dowries be Required by the Church Again Part II

by Therese Ivers, JCL

Good St. Nick is credited with giving a poor family dowries for each of the daughters of the house so that the young women would not have to engage in the world’s oldest profession. Dowries have been around for ages. Even today, in certain societies, the custom of requiring a dowry from the bride’s family is still very much alive. Often, this translates in real life to a shunning of females (think sex- selective abortions or infanticide), and a fostering of boys. Girls impoverish the family, and boys enrich the family line. Thus, parents in those cultures prefer to have boys rather than girls. In one sense, the custom of requiring a dowry from the bride’s family is a harsh one. It prevents otherwise eligible women from becoming marriage due to familial poverty. Certainly, there are cases where the woman is really “sold”, thanks to the solid dowry she brings.

That all being said, I think it is time to revisit the notion of a dowry for first world countries where the divorce rates are over 50%. In the USA, women are free to marry whom they please. A dowry is not expected or demanded, and she can be as poor as a church mouse or as rich as Queen Elizabeth. The downside is that even if a woman is sincere, has all it takes for a successful, happy, healthy, and holy marriage on her part, there is no guarantee that that is the case on the part of the husband. And vice versa. Since over 50% of marriages end in divorce, and women and children are often impoverished by divorce for a variety of reasons, it seems that the notion of a dowry should be revisited. Why? Because some ex spouses are truly deadbeats. Many single parents are women. They often struggle to put food on the table, supervise the formation of their children, and hope that despite the absence of a father, the children will grow up well rounded or “well adjusted”. This is often the case even if they are paid alimony and child support.

The dowry, or “marriage settlements”, in olden times would provide the woman and future children guaranteed funds during her/their lifetimes. Thus, the woman was financially secure regardless of whether the husband died, gambled away the family fortune, divorced, or became impoverished. It was a trust and it was in a very real sense, like a prenuptial agreement. I would suggest that women thinking about getting married have a dowry. This doesn’t have to be the significant sum that would enable a family to live comfortably off the interest for the duration of their lives. Rather, it can be a sum that would allow the married woman to live without the financial support of a husband for a reasonable length of time – a year or two perhaps – should she be widowed, become divorced, or if she was a stay at home mom, have to switch to becoming a provider in the event her husband loses his job or becomes disabled. A dowry could be a lifesaver if a woman hesitates to leave an abusive man mainly for financial reasons. This dowry should be legally protected in such a manner that it can only be tapped into for the benefit of the woman and children (or the husband and children if the man wishes to have his own “dowry”). Does this mean that the bride or bridegroom intends to divorce? No. It is insurance, pure and simple, for what is not a rare occasion in today’s world.

Posted in Dating, Discernment | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Should the Church Require Dowries Again?

by Therese Ivers, JCL

She signed the papers. For over 17 years she had been known as Sister Ellen Marie. Now with the Vatican’s permission and dispensation of her holy vows, she was Miss Sophie Kandlee (Sophie is a fictitious character made of the different women I have known in her situation). With $300 in her pocket and wearing lay clothes from the last postulant class that didn’t quite fit right, Sophie walked through the convent gate for the last time. Where to? She had friends who could let her stay for a week. After that, who knew? She trusted in the Lord’s providence.

Sophie didn’t have enough money to find a cheap place to rent. Her meager purse did not allow her to get much in the way of clothes from the mall and food on the table. In fact, she was officially homeless. Homeless like other women who joined convents without having or contributing a dowry and then when they received the dispensation from their vows, had no where to go and nothing to live upon.

Over and over, I meet the different Sophies. Good women who have discerned with their community (and Rome or their Bishop) that religious life is not their vocation and who have received the proper dispensations from their vows. What happens to them when they leave their convent? Many are poor and homeless. I have seen too many times how if they are lucky they might get $300 with a plane ticket somewhere. Some are more fortunate and might get a vehicle along with a hundred or two greenbacks. But how is the older woman to bootstrap her way up in society without a home, without proper clothes for work interviews, and often without a college degree or work experience?

Prior to 1983, the Church required that a woman entering the convent to bring with her a dowry. This money was to be set aside, and while the convent could use the interest to pay for expenses during the novitiate, they were not otherwise allowed to touch the fund. If the sister for whatever reason, and at whatever stage (novice, first professed, solemnly professed) left the convent, the funds were to be handed over to her immediately so that she could have a reasonable time to learn how to survive in the real world (as in at least a few months or a year). The convent only got the money if the sister died as sister. While the dowry requirement made it very difficult for impoverished women to enter a community, it protected those who did have one from becoming homeless like Sophie Kandlee.

Finances are not the only problem that former religious may face. Some come from cultish communities and need psychological deprogramming and help. Others have severe problems in adapting “back to the world” since their whole world had been the convent. Some feel betrayed by God and reject the faith because they gave their all and this was the result. There are those who jump into marriage or relationships with no discernment whatsoever simply to keep off the streets. Is this right for a woman who had given God and the Church her all for a good part of her life?

I propose three solutions for this problem. The first is that the dowry be reinstituted by the Church but instead of being made mandatory, it should be made optional.  While this may or may not ever come back into canon law, religious communities should consider allowing dowries in their rules.

Second, before entering a community, those without safety nets (reliable family/friend networks, professional skills and experience, college degrees, etc.) should consider accumulating a “dowry” and consulting a canon lawyer & civil attorney for ways of creating a safety net should they leave religious life.  Consider that even with a degree it is hard to start out life with $300 in the pocket and maybe a plane ticket.  Benefactors and friends may want to establish a safety net dowry fund for an individual or for a community so that those who leave are provided for.

The third (partial) solution to the ongoing problem is for charitable individuals, groups, or organizations to establish half way houses for former religious to help get them on their feet by teaching them life skills, job skills, financial know-how, and to provide spiritual and psychological assistance as needed.

Should you be interested in helping former religious get back on their feet, contact me via the contact form or in the forum.

P.S. Canon law does stipulate that the religious community be “charitable” to the departing member. However… for a lot of reasons womens religious communities CHOOSE not to follow this, or are UNABLE to help because they are poor themselves. By the time an appeal goes to the Vatican, the woman is already on the streets.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ten Tips for Vocational Discernment

by Therese Ivers, JCL

Happy New Year!  Here’s a list of some discernment tips that I hope will get your creative juices flowing in terms of shaping this years discernment process New Years resolutions…  Since each tip can be the topic of a whole book in and of itself, you are welcome to share your thoughts on them and share stories by going to the forum and commenting.


Our Lady, Pray for Us!

1) Do take the time to get to know all of your vocational options.
2) Starting a religious community?  Do wait until you have a few actual members together before you begin to approach the bishop.
3) Do think of the ways you can grow so as to offer the best possible version of yourself to your potential spouse, diocese, or community.
4) Do you think you’ll be more holy… if you become a sister, a monk, a priest, or get married?  Try sanctifying your daily actions now!
5) Do look at vocations in their nitty gritty aspects long term, not just the wedding day, the profession day, or day of consecration.
6) If you are living alone but regularly leave your home for more than a few hours a week, don’t put in an application to your bishop to become a diocesan hermit.
7) If you believe that the acts proper to the generation of children are sinful, ugly, or horrifying, or for any other (non medical) reason would be unwilling to consummate marriage vows, please do not get engaged or start seriously discerning celibate forms of life.
8) If you are a man, don’t sign up for the seminary for the diocesan priesthood until you have seriously examined religious life as a brother.
9) If you are a female virgin, don’t apply to become a consecrated virgin if you have not for some time lived out the resolution to perpetually remain a virgin regardless of whether you’ll be able to receive the consecration in the future.
10) If you are thinking about religious life, don’t join a community just because your spiritual director likes it or because you see that the brothers/sisters in it are joyful and happy.

(c) 2012 by Therese Ivers, JCL

Join the forum discussion on this post
Posted in Discernment, Hermits, Holy Orders, monks, vocations | Leave a comment

On Hermits and Virgins

                                                                                                                                                  by Therese Ivers, JCL

About fifteen years ago, while in the midst of my vocational discernment, I found an article on consecrated virgins.  The author described consecrated virgins as women who made public vows in the hands of the bishop, lived in strict solitude, and followed an individually crafted rule of life that had been approved by that bishop.  It was this article which convinced me that I did not have a vocation to consecrated virginity.  After all, I liked being among people!  What I didn’t know then, as I do now, is that such a description is a perfect fit for the vocation of diocesan hermits, and an almost entirely false one of consecrated virgins  living in the world (unless they happen to be diocesan hermits!).  There has been in the past, as well as in the present, a lot of confusion and misunderstanding about vocations to the eremitic and virginal life.  This is why I think it would be a good time to bring up some common myths about the two vocations.

Myth #1.  Hermits are the male counterpart of consecrated virgins.

The closest male counterpart to the consecrated virgin is the bishop.  There are several reasons for this.  One, the consecrated virgin most fully mirrors and represents the Church-Bride, for which reason she is called “bride of Christ”.  The bishop represents Christ-Bridegroom in the fullness of orders.  (This, incidentally, is why only a bishop -or abbot- can confer the consecration- he stands in the place of Christ the Bridegroom.)  As is the case with a bishop, the virgin receives and enters her vocation through the ministry of a bishop.  That is to say, a bishop enters the episcopacy through orders conferred upon him by the ordaining bishops, and a consecrated virgin enters the consecrated state through the consecration conferred upon her by the consecrating bishop.  It is important to note that in neither the case of a (non religious) diocesan bishop, nor in the consecrated virgin living in the world are vows/promises made which constitute the man a bishop or the woman a consecrated virgin.  Rather, it is the sacrament/sacramental conferred by the bishop which constitutes the person a bishop or a consecrated virgin.  Finally, both the virgin and the bishop are in what is known as the “state of perfection” (this is not the case of diocesan priests or deacons).

Hermits (solitaries, anchorites, anchoresses, etc.) may be male or female.  Thus, hermits (male) are the counterpart of hermitesses (female), not of consecrated virgins.  Perhaps one reason why people may think hermits are the male vocation equivalent to consecrated virgins is because both are individually lived vocations in the sense that they are not attached to a religious community of any kind.

Myth #2.  “Public” status requires visibility and “distinctness” for hermits and virgins

Some people object to the idea of becoming a hermit under the provisions of canon 603 because they perceive the public nature or status of the vocation of the diocesan hermit to be against the calling to solitude and silence.  That is, according to such persons, if you are a publicly consecrated diocesan hermit, this “public status” goes against the withdrawal from the world that the hermit seeks and lives.  Some people believe that consecrated virgins living in the world must live like religious because they believe that the consecrated state or the public state of consecration requires what is known as “separation from the world”.  Both are errors tied to misunderstandings about what a “public state” is, and of what constitutes the essential elements of the vocations in question.

What is a public state?  Continue reading

Posted in Canonical Requirements, Celibacy, Consecrated Virgins, Separation from the world | 7 Comments